So, I've spent the last few hours reading comics and buzzing around online, as is my usual custom when trying to get into the working headspace. I've actually just finished the collected version of
Demo, which was absolutely amazing. I've seen it before, and almost bought the singles, but when I caught wind of the trade, I decided to just wait it out. And it was well worth the wait. Everything that has been said about this comic is true. But this isn't a Demo review. That'll probably show up in some time tomorrow on
my other comic site, as well as reviews of Brian Wood's current monthly
DMZ,
Marvel Zombies,
Hatter M, and the long overdue review of
Fell. That is if I'm feeling ambitious. But speaking of
Fell, that book has actually been on my mind quite a bit lately.
For the past few weeks, while dealing with the beginnings of a few projects, pacing has become something of a whole new universe to me. I remember reading in I think
Come In Alone that Ellis used to have notebooks full of numbers. 66661666622, etc. Where each number would be the amount of panels per page, as to help with the readers pacing. Now, Ellis has openly admitted that he often views comics in the format of a pop song, in the way they are structured. Get the reader into a flow, and create a certain ambiance for the book. Frank Miller did something similar with the
Sin City books, in that the were all structured in a fashion that when the pattern or typical page structure was broken, it let the reader know that something important was happening. Alan Moore did that to an ever greater extent with
Watchmen. The formatting of the pages before the telling of story. It's in the same vein as the Lester Dent Pulp Fiction Master Plot, which I'd suggest checking out. But I think it can go further than that.
For instance. I read the
Transmetropolitan trades over the course of about two months when I first started buying them. Usually two a week. And it was great. It gave me time to mull over the books, reread them, and get excited about buying the next one. About three months ago, I read all of them in two days. In my opinion, that is the only way to do it. The whole thing flows together so amazingly that you can sit down and read the entire 1300 and some odd pages in 48 hours and feel completely satisfied with the story. Which makes sense, considering Ellis has reffered to Transmet as a 1300 page graphic novel, implying that is meant to be read straight through. Plot wise, the book covers about four years, if I remember correctly. Now, I have also recently polished off the
Preacher trades, reading one per week. Every pay day, I'd pick up the next in line, and knock it back that night. I then tried to read the whole thing in 48 hours, and I failed miserably. It was too much. I got through two trades and was completely drained. Meanwhile, having just caught up on the
100 Bullets trades, I found myself having to reread the previous trade if I was to have any hope of understanding the next in line. What the fuck does all of this mean?
Preacher only covers about two or three years. Less time than
Transmet, and more time than
100 Bullets thus far. So whats the difference between these books? Here's what I've got so far. Trasmet is told as one in your face story. The pacing of the story reflects the urgency of the main character, our lord and savior Spider Jerusalem. And not to say that the character is Transmet are one dimensional, because they aren't. If you pay attention, they are all developed in a very unique and sly manor. However,
Transmetropolitan seems to be about things happening in
the city and Spider and the filthy assistants reacting to them. To me, this seems like
Transmet would then be a character driven book, in the sense that what you want to read is what is how the characters are reacting to the things that are happening around them. But isn't
Preacher also a character driven book? When you hear the title, do the name Jesse, Tulip and Cassidy come to mind? Or does the idea of a man with the power of God out for revenge come to mind? Now, when you hear
Transmet, does Spiders name come to mind, or does an image of Spider pointing his Bowel Disrupter at The Beast come to mind? While reading
Preacher, whenever a huge event would happen, I'd feel like I'd need to time process it, just as the characters did, to fully appreciate the situation along with the characters. With
Transmet, whenever something happens, ie; the death of Dita, I wanted to see how intense and obscenity ridden Spider's response would be. I was watching what was happening to Spider. I was living with what was happening to Jesse and the gang. But both books were equally as amazing.
Now, it could have been the difference in settings and time frames, but I don't see how that would affect my ability to digest the stories in a given ammout of time. Now, with
100 Bullets I understand why it I have to reread it every time. The book is dense. Plot twists, a few similar looking characters, organizations, rules, a shit ton of characters. All in all, it's a really complicated book. And it should be. It wouldn't be as good if it wasn't. It's a mystery. That's the draw. You have absolutely no fucking clue what is going to happen from issue to issue, or in my case, trade to trade. But still, I've tried to go back and read straight through the entire series, and I did, but it didn't add or take away from the newest addition, in that it really only refreshed my memory of what the fuck was going on. So what the fuck am I getting at? This is what has started to form:
-Trasmetropolitan: A series of events propelled forward by the reactions of the main characters.
-Preacher: The story of a group of characters and the events that brought them to where they are.
-100 Bullets: An intricate web of plot using the characters, whom aren't always character specific in the need, to push the reader further into the story.
So where do you begin? In the current way comics are put together, sold, collected, etc., how does one approach that. Do you keep in mind the way the story will wind up hitting the readers? How much has really been brought to light about this aspect of the comic world is what I'm really interested in. So speak your minds. Thoughts, additions, notes, objections? This seems like it could become an important aspect to consider if we are to push the medium of comics further.
-A